Supporting Families
  • banner6
  • banner4
  • banner3
  • banner13
  • banner8
  • banner2
  • banner7
  • banner12
  • banner11
  • banner10
Thursday, 22 October 2015 20:09

Talk at Conference on Admission to Grammar School and the Kent Test

 Kent Test Presentation

21 October 2015

NOTE: This presentation was made the day before KCC announced, on the initiative of the Leader, Paul Carter, that a commission was to be set up to explore wider access to grammar schools. My presentation closes with a section below that addresses precisely this issue.

I have amplified the presentation in places to pick up several discussion points.

You will find my article about the Conference here

Kent Test Conference

Photo of Matthew Bartlett at Kent Test Conference
Courtesy of Kent on Sunday

This presentation explores two main themes: admission to Kent grammar schools and the Kent Test. Some may think these are the same, but the reality is that the Kent Test provides only part of the opportunity for children to gain entry to grammar school, with alternative routes being such that there are no two grammar schools out of the 32 in Kent (nor indeed of the six in Medway), that have the same expectation of potential applicants.

Of course the hot news of the moment is the new annex in Sevenoaks and how it will affect school admissions, and I will also say a few words about that......

On a personal note, some of you will know that I am stepping back on my work on admissions and appeals, and have chosen to take a complete break this month apart from this evening. KCC used to offer a free independent advisory service at this time, but sadly government cuts have seen this removed to the specific disadvantage of those who least understand processes. Please make no mistake. Whilst in many parts of Kent and for most people, decisions on which schools to apply for are fairly straightforward, but in some situations, those least able to understand the process make serious mistakes, and of particular relevance this evening, are put off applying for grammar schools being bewildered by the appeals process, when children have the potential to succeed at grammar school.

32 Grammar Schools, 32 Admission profiles
Of Kent’s 32 grammar schools, three are what is called super selective, expecting entrants to achieve high scores in the Kent Test, although all three use different cut-offs and different rules for residence. Another six are partially super-selective, the Dartfords, Wilmingtons, Maidstone Grammar, and Simon Langton Boys, which each give priority to a differing proportion of high scoring pupils again operating on individual rules. Then there are the five that operate their own tests as an additional route to admission alongside the Kent Test, the Dover Grammars, the Folkestone Grammars and Mayfield in Gravesend. Several of these admit more than half their pupils via the local test, including Dover Girls Grammar which demonstrates the validity of the process by producing some of the best GCSE and A Level results in the county. Between them, these add in nearly 2% more of Kent children to the total passes.

That leaves 18 that admit on the straight pass score. The Kent Test, pass mark is set to admit 21% of the children of the county, but only passed 20% in 2014 the latest date for which I have this information at present, showing more success for girls, an issue to which I shall return later. 

2014  Kent Test Boys Girls Total % Boys % Girls % Total
Number of Kent Pupils 7986 7608 15594      
Took Kent Test 4883 5004 9887 61% 66% 63%
Automatic Pass 1555 1557 3112 19.5% 20.5% 20.0%

An interesting phenomenon is that the percentage of girls taking the test is significantly higher than that of boys, with a similar pattern in Medway. Why? 

However, this is only part of the story and the other two routes break the myth that the Kent Test is a one off pass or fail to enter grammar.

Headteacher Assessment
A second tranche of children are found of grammar school ability, by what is known as the “Headteacher Assessment”.  This rightly comes at the question of ability from a different direction, looking at children’s work, past test grades and headteachers recommendation that can cover any issues thought relevant and Emma will go into more detail on this.  

Headteacher Assessment is supposed to find another 4% of children selective across the county, but the reality can be higher, and in recent years has been as high as 6%, although falling over the past two years, to around 4.6 % for the most recent assessment. To complicate it further, the assessment of work traditionally favours girls so this splits, giving passes to 7.5% of girls and 5.5% of boys for the 2014 test (the 2015 figures being my best estimate from the data currently available).

Kent Test Headteacher Assessment Outcomes 2014 & 2015
  HTA Boys Girls Total % Boys % Girls % Total
2014 Entered 990 1082 2072 13% 14% 14%
Passed 443 567 1010 5.5% 7.5% 6.5%
2015
(estimated)
        5.2% 7.4% 6.3%

 An even greater issue is that with pressure of places in the west of the county, children are nearly twice as likely to get through in the east, with mid-Kent somewhere between.

The target overall pass rate is 25%, but for 2015, it is 25.6%, for the second time again favouring girls, by 26.6%, with the boys 24.7%. Under the old Kent Test, with no literacy component, boys led on the test itself, with girls coming out top on HTA, producing an even split on the final outcome. Now, we have seen in both years of the new Test, a considerable gap opening, favouring the girls, with consequent changes in the pressure on grammar school places for the two genders.

Overall pass Rates for Kent Children 2014 & 2015
  Boys Girls Total % Boys % Girls % Total
2014 2104 2176 4280 24.7% 26.6% 25.6%
2015 1998 2124 4122 25.0% 27.9% 26.4%
 
Grammar School Appeals
This of course is before grammar school appeals, which come from yet another direction, allowing parents to produce whatever evidence they wish to show their child is of grammar school ability.  Nearly 700 of these were successful this summer, over a hundred more than in 2014, but some can be discounted for this purpose for various reasons, such as children already passed seeking places in oversubscribed grammar schools and discounting out of county children, allowing at least 500 more Kent children to be found suitable for grammar school. The variation, school by school, in success rates at appeal is staggering, ranging from the astonishing figure of 146 from Chatham and Clarendon Grammar, in Ramsgate, with 33 successful, to 70 at Dartford Boys, with just 6 successful, five of who had already been found of grammar school ability by the Kent Test. That excludes Cranbrook School, the only grammar in the county with entry at age 13 plus, which had just one appeal which was unsuccessful.

Another specific example from me: Weald of Kent Grammar in 2014, had 48 successful appeals out of 69 as it sought to expand numbers, possibly in preparation for the Sevenoaks Annex. Last summer, when the annex looked in doubt, the school “discovered” it had no more room and the success rate fell sharply to 6 out of 70. For 2016 admission the school has amazingly found this no longer to be the case and is admitting an additional 60 girls, so I guess that successful appeals will once again rise in number, building towards the annex opening in 2017, unless the annex falls to a challenge when the expansion could suddenly vanish. Such variations although not usually as extreme as this are not uncommon as schools situations change.  For, increasingly, appeal panel decisions tend to reflect the meaning of “selective ability” according to demand for places at the school and the schools wishes.

Overall the appeal numbers amount to a further 3% of Kent children being offered places meaning that in total over 30% of Kent children will have been awarded grammar school places in the County for 2015 admissions and, for the above reasons, with a profile that can vary widely from school to school. As you can see, there is no way one can estimate the chance of success at appeal any more without understanding something about the school concerned and its priorities, although too many ill-informed prophets try. I cross checked my figure with the 2014 school census for comparison when 29% of Kent children were in Year Seven in Kent grammar schools, the discrepancy probably explained by the rise in successful grammar school appeals this year, and by children dropping out of the system to go to private schools.

The New Kent Test
So let us turn to the Test itself and the reason for the rise in appeals.

Part of the answer for the rise in appeals lies in the nature of the new Kent Test itself, now in its second year of operation, and introduced for two main reasons: to reduce the effect of coaching and also to introduce an element of literacy into the test.

Let us first look at the makeup of the test, for those unfamiliar with it. 

Structure of the Kent Test
There are two separate tests, each lasting about an hour, including practice sessions
The two papers are both multiple choice
Verbal and Non-Verbal Reasoning (two sections)
English and Mathematics
There is a third paper, a writing exercise, only used if there is a HTA
Marking the Kent Test
The two tests are both Multiple Choice, marked by Optical Mark Readers.
For 2015, results were divided into three equally weighted sections:
1) Reasoning Paper
2) English Section
3) Mathematics Section

 

Kent Test Marks
The Kent Test pass score is selected annually so that 21% of the Kent cohort of children will be found selective.
The marking for the Kent Test is nationally standardised, so that 21% of a sample of the national population achieves a score of 113 or better on each test.
National standardisation ensures that children born in each calendar month are measured against children of the same age. Research I have carried shows no significant advantage to being born in any month (as distinct from Medway)!
 

I must admit that after seeing the outcomes of last year’s test, requiring candidates to achieve a standardised score of just 106 in each of three multiple choice assessments in English, maths and reasoning, together with an aggregate score of 320, I forecast that the pass standard would rise this year, but I have been proved wrong. This should be a matter of concern.

A nationally standardised score of 106 places the child in the 34th percentile, far below the 21st percentile of the grammar school standard. This would be 113 in each test. I analysed individual scores last year (2015 figures still to come) in an attempt to find out the reason for this low mark and came to the following conclusions. Coaching still has a significant effect, with boys and girls achieving above national averages in each section but less than in the old Kent Test. However, it is impossible to be precise as at KS2 Kent children were performing above national averages at both Level 4 and also Level 5, the target for grammar school performance which may account for much or all of the three points average raise above the national average. There is however, an effect clearly seen in the reasoning tests, which averaged 5 standardised points higher than both English and maths. The main reason that the cut-off of 106 is so low, is that children (mainly boys) scored higher in mathematics or (mainly girls) English but too many were not up to standard in both.

Scores in Individual sections of the Kent Test 2014
2014
Maximum
Mark
Pass Mark
21% Score
Boys
21% Score
Girls
Reasoning
141
106
 121
 121
English
140
106
 114
 116
Mathematics
141
106
 118
 116

What I do believe this also shows is that the reasoning test is more susceptible to coaching in any case, and as it is different from normal classwork, that is where the emphasis has again been placed too highly by those preparing children for the test.

Literacy and numeracy should be central to any programme of preparation for the eleven plus and good coaching here can only be of benefit to children’s achievement.

There is now a further worry about the new Test, and that is that there will be children who are passing automatically with scores that can be as low as 106,106, 108. These could be children who are not up to standard and I have already heard reports from several grammar schools of such children who are already struggling. Of course, some may just be the product of poor teaching and will flourish in their new environment. Many of those they have displaced will have evidence of grammar school ability, and so hopefully will win through on headteacher assessment or appeal.

So where now? I am confident the new Test is a more effective model than the “Old Kent Test” in that it both reduces the effect of coaching and also places more reliance on curriculum assessments. However, the low pass standard is certainly letting too many children into grammar school who may not be up to standard, and I once again expect it to rise for next year, when the message gets home that English and maths are the key to success. It does beg the question that, if with most children who fail, the deciding factor is the English or maths, what then is the purpose of the reasoning, the most coachable element of the test?

Wider social Access to Grammar Schools
Then there is the recent Report of the Sutton Trust, committed to promoting equality of opportunity, into the performance of grammar schools.

It is highly critical of too many grammar schools for shutting the doors of opportunity and rewarding the effects of coaching. In typical Trust fashion it does come up with some possible ways forward, several of which are already developing in Kent.

Sutton Trust Recommendations
1) Ensure the testing system does not disadvantage pupils from low and middle income backgrounds.
2) Provide a minimum ten hours test preparation for all pupils to provide a more level playing field.
3) Improve outreach work significantly, actively encouraging high achieving students from low and middle income backgrounds to apply.
4) Schools should consider the merits of powers available in the admissions code to attract high achieving students who are entitled to the Pupil Premium.
5) Primary schools could do more to encourage their high achieving children to apply to grammar schools in selective areas, and develop partnerships with grammar schools.
6) Build new partnerships with non-selective schools to support their high achieving students
 
Comments:
1) Any Test will place such children at a disadvantage. The task is to minimise this, as can be seen in several of the new local alternative tests, such as the ones in Dover and Folkestone.
2) An excellent proposal, especially as the only research (now quite old) suggests this is the optimum amount of time for preparing for reasoning tests with a specific pass mark (the grammar school standard).
3) This is already happening with at least two grammar schools, those in Sittingbourne, who run “Aim High” classes for primary school children.
4)Queen Elizabeth’s Grammar School in Faversham offers this as a priority in its oversubscription criteria.
5) I agree, but there is much good practice around.
6) There are already examples of this in existence, such as the one between Canterbury Academy and Simon Langton Boys’ Grammar School.
 
Conclusion
As the Sutton Trust and others remind us, admission to grammar school can be fiercely competitive. Outside the state schools, many private schools exist primarily to secure places at grammar school. The large and rapidly expanding tutoring industry can be very effective in the same aim, where it is good, but it is as yet unregulated – so beware. This is an understandable outcome of parental aspirations to get their children into grammar school or perhaps the right grammar school, some going so far as to use both private and coaching routes to get there, in extreme cases, from the age of five.

Kent has a selective system, comprising both grammar and non-selective schools, which overall performs above its expectation at both GCSE and A Level. There is no appetite to change this, so the task is to make the selection process as fair as possible and I believe the new test and the admission flexibilities are a step in the right direction; implementation of the recommendations of the Sutton Trust on a wider scale would take it further. 

Last modified on Wednesday, 30 December 2015 20:12

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

Latest News & Comments

Just click on a news item below to read it in full. Feel free to subscribe to the news via the email link to the right or the RSS Feed at the bottom of the page. Please note that the 800 or so regular subscribers who receive each news item directly are not included in the number of readers recorded below the item. If you have a view on any item posted, please leave a comment. Also feel free to suggest items of news, or areas where comment is needed to: peter@kentadvice.co.uk. \nNews items appear as and when I have time in a very busy schedule supporting clients.

  • Fort Pitt, Holcombe and Rochester Grammar Schools: Schools Adjudicator Rejects Admission Criteria as Unlawful

    The Schools Adjudicator, responsible for deciding on school admission policy disputes, has ruled that the determined admission arrangements for 2019 for these three schools are in breach of the Schools Admissions Code and ordered them to be changed. This will ensure that the new rules are fairer to local children or, in the case of The Rochester Grammar School, that more appropriately qualified girls are admitted.

    Three other schools acknowledged the validity of my complaint at an early stage and withdrew their proposals. These were: Brompton Academy, Hundred of Hoo Academy and Sir Joseph Williamson’s Mathematical School.

    Medway Council, with oversight of school admission rules published on its website, neither took action to block the unlawful proposals (if indeed they noticed them), nor bothered to express a view on their legality to the Schools Adjudicator when invited. There has been just one complaint about a Kent school's proposals since 2012 (relating to In-Year Admissions), as KCC monitors proposed changes. 

    To look at the decisions in detail follow the links: Fort Pitt; Holcombe Grammar; The Rochester Grammar, with my analysis below.

    Read more...
    Written on Thursday, 13 September 2018 20:15 4 comments Read 2739 times
  • Academy News: September 2018

    I am afraid this regular update is well overdue because of pressures elsewhere. I will be publishing a second article shortly (I hope) but this one is primarily about new and proposed academies and the increasing practice of re-assigning academies to other Trusts when there has been a break down of performance in some way. 

    Panorama, 10th September: Financial Mismanagement in Academy Trusts
    This is a subject that I have explored many times in these pages, most commonly in the scandal of Lilac Sky Academy Trust and more recently with The SchoolsCompany Academy Trust. I have enclosed a comment outlining the issues with the two Trusts at the foot of this page. 

    Another ten schools have become academies this year, bringing the Kent total to 89% out of 101 secondary schools including applications in progress, and 37% of 456 primaries. In Medway 16 out of 17 secondary schools and 54 of the 79 primaries are academies. You will find all the latest conversions below, along with new applications to become academies, and a full list of Kent and Medway academies here.

    The number of Multi Academy Trusts continues to proliferate, some with ever more exotic names; you will find a full list of Kent and Medway Trusts here.

    Read more...
    Written on Monday, 10 September 2018 23:42 Be the first to comment! Read 295 times
  • Private Schools Coaching for Grammar Entrance

    This is an updated and revised version of a story I wrote as the events below unfolded 

    The BBC excitedly revealed the results of ‘an exclusive undercover investigation’ on Monday last. This had discovered to no one’s surprise that private schools depending on a high rate of pupils securing grammar school places for their existence prepare those pupils for the Kent Test. You will find on the BBC website here a much watered down version of the original headline grabbing, anti-grammar school story which dominated the channel and Radio Kent for two days leading up to the Kent Test. The programme was followed the next day by another ‘lead story’ which also recycled and expanded on remarks by Robert Halfon, MP and Chairman of the Government Select Committee on Education, several months earlier but presented as breaking news. This also criticised KCC for creating ‘confusion’ by not knowing how a Review it had commissioned into coaching would turn out! 

    The two BBC employees who have taken the trouble to express their great unhappiness about the story to me confidentially, are completely in the right. The new anodyne website version which completely loses the initial hysteria is surely an implicit acknowledgement of the error of judgement.  

    The BBC 'revelation’ about private school coaching can hardly come as news to anyone who has had dealings with or enquired about admissions to private primary schools for possible entry over the past decade or so. Many of these schools owe their existence to their ‘success rate’ in seeing pupils secure places at grammar schools, whether or not they contributed to it. They will charge families up to £10,000 p.a. to maximise chances, advertising their achievements through websites and in the media .

    It is most unfortunate that the BBC item was published this week in particular, attracting a large amount of media coverage in the run up to Thursday’s Kent Test. For it, and the subsequent media comment swirling around about grammar school matters in general, would have been an unnecessary distraction for many of the families whose children sat the test.

    Read more...
    Written on Tuesday, 04 September 2018 09:50 2 comments Read 467 times
  • Paul Carter and Grammar School Numbers

    Revised 1st September

    Paul Carter, Leader of KCC had an important interview with The Times published on Monday, along with commentary by the newspaper which can be found here.  He expresses concern that the proportion of pupils admitted to Kent’s 32 grammar schools has risen to well over the 25% target set by the Council, which risks weaken­ing the specialist purpose of grammar schools and is damaging to non-select­ive schools nearby, diluting the quality of their intake. This is down primarily to the operation of the school admission appeals process in some schools, the expansion of planned grammar school places not keeping pace with the general rise in numbers of the school population.

     I have written my own analysis of the situation earlier this year, but went further and explored the reasons why the proportion of Year 7 Kent grammar school pupils had risen to 31.7% from 30.3% between 2012 and 2017, and why it was in any case above 25%.

    Paul’s article, whilst showing unhappiness about the situation, identifies his own reasons for the increased proportion but gives no indication there is an appetite to wind back the proportion of children going on to grammar school. Indeed, I don’t believe that with the loss of control by KCC to individual academies this would be possible.

    Read more...
    Written on Thursday, 30 August 2018 20:12 Be the first to comment! Read 417 times
  • Falling Rolls,Year 10 through to GCSE

    On Tuesday, The Times newspaper headlined a story about schools removing pupils or encouraging them to leave in the run up to GCSE, followed by two pages of analysis inside the paper. This is an issue I have followed closely in recent years, mainly from the viewpoint of numbers of children being Home Educated and Permanently Excluded, most recently here.

    Medway UTC 1


    This article explores schools where the roll has fallen way above the norm over this period. On average 2% of Kent children leave mainstream schools in Years 10 and 11, and 4% in Medway, raising the question of why this should happen at all. Surprisingly, the schools losing the most pupils are generally different between 2016-17 and 2017-18, suggesting that none have a consistent policy to remove pupils unlikely to do well before GCSE, although several have extremely high levels of ‘Elective’ Home Education. This is contrary to the examples given in The Times.

    For the cohort taking GCSE in 2018, the five biggest losses of pupils were: were: Medway UTC 25%; New Line Learning and Victory (Medway) Academies 13%; Oasis Isle of Sheppey Academy 10% and Robert Napier School (Medway) 9% the only school to appear in the lists for both years. In 2017 they were: Orchards Academy 17%; Brompton and Strood Academies (both Medway) 12%; Ebbsfleet Academy and Thamesview School 11%. In all cases that is three or more pupils on average from every class. Below I give a fuller list for each year.

    Read more...
    Written on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 16:38 1 comment Read 295 times
  • GCSE Results and Admission to Sixth Forms

    GCSE results out yesterday have provided considerable speculation as to the effect of the changes. What follows is a very personal view, parts of which were shared in an interview on ITV Meridian last evening. I conclude with a brief consideration of applications to school Sixth Form courses, also looking at certain illegal practices, amazingly including further malpractice at Maidstone Grammar School for Girls.

    It is my opinion, shared  by many others, that GCSE students are the victims of yet another of a series of pointless changes. These appear to me to have no virtue whatever, as explained below. However, whatever has been thrown at them, my congratulations go out to those that have achieved their aims at GCSE and my commiserations to those who have not.

    Sadly, the latest changes are yet another massage of GCSE structure and assessment methods to enable the latest in a line of governments to try and convince us that something is being done to improve standards.

    Read more...
    Written on Friday, 24 August 2018 23:17 1 comment Read 529 times