Supporting Families
Displaying items by tag: school appeals

The Local Government Ombudsman has today (July 6th) published a highly critical report on the Independent Appeal Panel for Tunbridge Wells Grammar School for Girls for entry last September (2010). Whilst no fault was found with the school's actions (apart from engaging a Kent County Council Panel), KCC itself comes in for heavy criticism on a variety of fronts:........

Regular browsers of this website will be be well aware of my concerns about the accountability of academies. I have just posted my initial advice and views on complaints about Independent Panels set up by academies to hear admission appeals. Sadly, I am very disappointed.......

 

Complaints about maladministration by Independent Appeal Panels organised by academies should be sent to the Secretary of State. That is all the information I have been able to discover from my enquiry to the Department for Education, which considers this a sufficient explanation for any parent who wishes to complain.

I have asked why there is no relevant information on the Department of Education website, but the DofE response is that parents will find it if they go to http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/adminandfinance/schooladmissions/a00195/current-codes-and-regulations. What parents then are expected to do is to work out that they should follow the link to the Appeals Code of 1st February, then when this comes up, navigate to page 23, paragraph 5.4 and then see the phrase in brackets which simply states: (but not an Academy, therefore such complaints about appeal panels for Academies need to be referred to the Secretary of State). This is included in three paragraphs about the work of the Ombudsman, including a link to the advice line. Where do you get advice from the Secretary of State? Further, the Local Government Ombudsman website is packed with advice on how to make a complaint and  reference to  the advice centre.

The muddle continues with schools and local authorities still too often providing wrong advice. Fort Pitt Grammar School ,which has been an Academy for two years is still advising parents to complain to the Local Government Ombudsman.  Last year, and organisation called the YPLA handled complaints but this has been disbanded, an replaced by the Education Funding Agency, which is not mentioned in the Code of Practice. One email I received last year regarding the YPLA stated: "I am trying to sort out the letter to send. Every number I phone to get an address seems to be the wrong one. Do you have an address for where I should send my letter or a name of anyone I should contact. The name and number on the back of the letter is irrelevant.I was wondering about emailing the clerk of the panel as he sent me the letter with the wrong info on?? I seem to be hitting a brick wall on this one". THe DofE website makes clear that the Education Funding Agency is the correct agency to complain to, and you will find the process explained here. Each appeal decision letter is required (not all do as not all schools or academies are keen on parents complaining!) to tell parents where they go to to complain, but many are wrong.  

I have considerable experience in supporting parents through the Ombudsman process, where I am able to identify all key issues and simply take over the process if you wish, greatly reducing stress and time spent, and using my expertise to maximise your chances of success (I will also tell parents honestly if I can't see a way forward).

I now have successful experience of taking complaints on maladministration of Appeal Panels to the Secretary of State  and am very happy to continue this, my own track record having seen 35 successes from my last 40 complaints to the Local Government Ombudsman.

Last year I won two out of thirteen of all successful complaints nationally about maladministration of admission appeal panels for academies  settled by 30th September 2011, and half of all those in Kent! The statistics show it is far harder to win a complaint for an Academy Appeal Panel than with the Local Government Ombudsman (see below). 

Last year, the YPLA was able to make one of three decisions as a result of its investigations into complaints about Independent Appeal Panels for Academies:

A. Maladministration that the YPLA considers may have caused injustice.  Where this is the decision a fresh appeal is required to be heard by a different panel.

B. Maladministration that the YPLA does not consider to have caused injustice.  Where this is the decision no fresh appeal is required

C. No maladministration.

The full figures are as follows:

OUTCOMES OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT ADMISSION APPEAL PANEL ADMINISTRATION MADE TO YPLA BEFORE 30 SEPTEMBER 2011

 

Total received

Decision Pending / Awaiting Further Info from parent or Clerk A* B* C* Parent Withdrew Complaint
National 107 16 7 3 78 3
Kent County Council Area 18 0 4 1 13 0
Medway Council Area 0 - - - - -

* Letters refer to decisions in previous paragraph.

Compared to Ombudsman decisions, there is a remarkably low proportion of successful complaints settled so far. Of course it may be that those where decisions are pending include a higher proportion of cases which may be settled in favour of the complainant.

By comparison, for 2010 entry, the Local Government Ombudsman heard 1403 school admission complaints nationally, fairly similar proportionately, given the number of schools involved. For Kent in 2010, there were 35 complaints to the Ombudsman about school admissions for county/community schools although the outcomes are not recorded. Kent foundation and voluntary aided schools produced 77 complaints of which 30 were the subject of local settlements (this means in general that the complaints were upheld with a fresh appeal or a recommendation to admit directly to the school), and in Medway, 6 out of 18 were upheld.

There thus appears to be a dramatic fall in the chances of success for complaints about academies, three possible reasons being as follows. Firstly, those still pending may produce a higher proportion of success, as they may be the subject of further investigation, but this would still leave the chances of success much lower. Secondly, the process of determining outcomes has significant differences. Normally in Ombudsman cases, there is discussion of the issues arising between the parties so that all have a chance to comment on the other's case. The complainant usually sees the appeal clerk's notes and the admission authority's comments on the case. he is then able to challenge any wrong information put forward. The Ombudsman issues a provisional view which either side can challenge and put forward further information. On the other hand, with the YPLA, the academy gets to see the complaint, but the parent does not see their response - this is clearly unfair! There may be limited informal discussion, but the first real indication one has of the  outcome is the final decision. Thirdly, the Ombudsman website is packed with information and advice on complaints, backed up by a telephone support line. There is no such help available for complaints to the YPLA.  There is solely information on the address to send a complaint to. One of the massive frustrations reported by schools and parents alike, is the difficulty in contacting real people - telephone numbers all too often lead to message boards where no one answers!

I am happy to be corrected on any of the above views or information.

I have now had the opportunity to work through the new draft consultation Codes for School Admissions and School Admission Appeals. The consultation lasts for twelve weeks, and it is planned the Codes will apply for admissions from September 2013 onwards. To my mind the main proposals that affect families are:

I am currently caught up with supporting clients going through the appeals process and so have limited time to focus on the controversial consultation papers on School Admissions and Appeals. However, I have produced an item on the news page of this website regarding Michael Gove's comments, and .......

Michael Gove has made an announcement on school admissions ahead of a new Code of Practice for School Admissions, that will have far reaching effects on our schools. Details are still awaited, but popular schools will be able to increase their annual intake without current restrictions designed to ensure that not too many vacant spaces are left in any area. Already, academies can increase numbers for one year without reference to Local Authorities, But this looks like introducing a control free expansion of popular schools which will see others (not necessarily failing) wither on the vine........

The first Kent Group appeal hearing took place last night at Maidstone Grammar School for Girls. I have commented on this innovation earlier, see below. The hearing considered solely general issues of oversubscription; individual cases will be heard during the week. It appears to have been a very civilised occasion, ..........

I am delighted to report that in just three months, the website has now clocked up 20,000 visitors.Of these nearly four out of five find their way here via google, nearly all the rest simply navigate to the website address directly.For April, main search engine request was for "kentadvice" or something similar. After this comes "Peter Read"; then "Bishop of Rochester Academy" or similar - reflecting the recent controversy there; "kent grammar schools"; "school admissions"; "kent school appeals", "kent grammar school appeals"; "kent primary school admissions"; "kent education ombudsman"; and "kirsten cardus" - headteacher of Barton Court Grammar School (must confess I don't understand this one).

My next busy period starts on Tuesday until the beginning of July, as I prepare my clients for appeals,.....

The last two days have been fairly typical for the start of March and a two minute break produces the following. It all began yesterday with emails, visits to clients and phone calls, fitting in a BBC SE interview which took place, for difficult to explain reasons, in Strood Cemetery.  Nearly 1800 hits on the website.

Today began with an 8 a.m. extended interview at Radio Kent HQ in Tunbridge Wells, followed by visits to clients, more emails and phone calls and the beginning of several appeal letters. The whole enlivened by tuning into the highly entertaining spat between the headteachers of the private schools of Gads Hill school and Kings School, Rochester. In my view Mr Craggs of Gads Hill won hands down. Dr Walker of King School didn't endear himself to me by asserting that Independent School results are the best. At A Level the only area where the schools can be properly compared, Kings comes below three Medway Grammar Schools on the two main counts, and below the other three on average point score per student. I doubt the argument shows much credit on either school as they compete to attract those children who have just missed out on a grammar school place.

I shall be on Radio Kent between 8 and 9 in the morning of Wednesday March 2nd, and possibly later on, answering questions and talking about transfer patterns and issues.

Decisions arrive by email for those who have applied electronically after 4 p.m. on March 1st. With some 80% of the 20,000 children involved in Kent and Medway having completed online applications, this can still be a lengthy process, with some families waiting several hours for their decision. All applicants will have a letter posted on that day aimed to arrive by post on March 2nd setting out the school allocated and the procedure if you wish to appeal for a school you have not been offered.

Please note, if you now wish to apply for a new school in Kent that you have not previously listed, there is a new system forcing you to go through the bureaucratically cumbersome In Year Admission process, details here, or from KCC.  For Medway it appears much quicker, a complete turn around from two years ago when you couldn't even apply for new schools at this stage.

I am already arranging consultations for clients, so please contact me as soon as you know the school to which you have been allocated. Remember, the minimum you need to do to appeal is to write on the form provided:  "I am appealing for a place for my child (name) at (name) school. A more detailed letter will follow". This enables you to take your time over putting your appeal together without needing to rush to meet deadlines.

Several firms of Kent solicitors are now offering appeal services at fees which appear to be some £160 per hour or more. Please remember that preparing school appeals are not primarily legal matters. I believe my own experience of over 600 successful school appeals over the past eight years, together with my extensive knowledge of admission and appeals matters across Kent and Medway is a strong recommendation in itself.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 2