Supporting Families
  • Once again, thank you so much for your help and support with Elliott - its been a long road but we are thrilled with the outcome, as is Elliott. We can't begin to tell you how glad we are we found your website.
Thursday, 28 June 2012 14:40

Bearsted Primary School Places Campaign: Reported Blunder at St John's - Latest

LATEST (1st July): It is being widely reported that three additional places have been offered at St John's CofE Primary School in Grove Park, at the eye of the Bearsted primary schools admissions storm, following a mistake by the school governors in allocating places initially. Apparently a parent found a discrepancy between the supplementary admission form (designed to establish religious affiliation) and the school's oversubscription rules. Governors had followed the form, but not the rules.

This brings the school's admission numbers up to 33 which coincidentally is the number identified by the governors a month ago, as being a possible maximum they could accept. I could not understand this, as it would breach Infant Class Legislation, (and in any case how would an appeal panel decide which three children to favour?), but is the position in which the school now finds itself. 

The rules make clear that such a breach of Infant Class legislation has no immediate effect for the school year 2012 - 2013, but if numbers remain above 30 for 2013 - 2014, the the school is required to either set up another class with a fresh teacher or else employ two full-time teachers in the class. One wonders what the appeal panel for the school, sitting this week, will make of this with the Infant Class Legislation rule already breached. Will they decline to admit additional children as the rules imply or, with resources apparently available, will they accept further children to make up a second class. If there are initially insufficient to provide a full class, I am sure that there would be other late applications from local families whose children are still not settled in a suitable school.   

This is by no means the first time a church school has found itself compromised by confusing oversubscription rules relating to church attendance, with over fifty such schools across the county each applying their own criteria; see for example: Deal Parochial School. However, it is certainly the most embarrassing; with the flavour being seen at School Allocation Trouble

The debate at KCC (see below) takes place after this week's St John's appeals. My original thought was that it needed to focus on ensuring there are sufficient local places for next year and beyond in the Bearsted area, but this information could change everything...... 

Sadly, I understand that there were no successful appeals at Madginford Park Infant School or Thurnham CofE Infant School, as was to be expected with Infant Class Legislation applying. 

St Paul's Infant School which has offered places to most of the displaced Bearsted children, but suffers from being several miles away, has recently been awarded a GOOD OFSTED Report, which may ease some minds. 

(PREVIOUSLY) The Bearsted School Allocation Trouble action group have collected the 1000 signatures necessary on an e-petition, to force Kent County Council to  hold a full debate on the shortage of Reception class places in the Bearsted area. This will take place at the County Council meeting on 19th July. This is a rare example of parents coming together to tackle admission issuesr. So often the problem is that parents believe they are in competition with each other - in cases such as this if parents don't combine, then everyone is the loser. Otherwise, parents are often afraid to put their heads over the parapet, in case they are picked on and lose their place at appeal, and are happy to sit back and let someone else take the flack. Once again, with Infant Class Legislation, usually the only solution is to try and create an extra class or section of a class, as an appeal panel is not in  a position to offer one or two places. 

So, what has been achieved so far? Initially, I was told on Radio Kent that my statistics for urban Maidstone were wrong, and that there were places. I have been shown to be right - there aren't. Then the campaign team was told that there actually just a handful of local children affected; they have evidence this claim is wrong.  In other words, we have established that the forecasting and planning for numbers was flawed. Paul Carter, Leader of Kent County Council, and local councillor for part of this area, has taken up the case, recognising that there is indeed a shortage of places and is exploring possible solutions to the problem, recognising that this is not just a one year issue.  The Campaign has been successful in attracting publicity for their concerns on BBC SE, Radio Kent, the Kent Messenger, Kent on Sunday, and this website, below.  

Now, the Team has discovered that when the Grove Green estate was built, plans were made for two primary schools to serve it. Only one was ever built, hence the problems of 2012. Kent County Council's Commissioning Plan for School provision appears to identify few problems in the area (although it sees all primary schools being full in 2014!), and indeed believes pupil rolls will fall after 2014. The statement  that all primary schools in the area will be full in terms of total rolls in 2014 hides a fundamental flaw that permeates other parts of the Plan as well. What that actually means is that as there will be vacancies in the junior age groups, if the schools are technically fully it is because there are more infant class children than there are places, although there is no school to accommodate the extras.  This appears to be a problem for at least the next three years, and is forecast to be a shortfall of 30 in 2014. How confident can one be over forecasting that failed to spot the problem this year?  

The Plan makes no mention of the nearly 200 additional houses being built on the old Maidstone TV Studio site; one wonders if the potential purchasers are being told there are no schools for their children! Are these factored into the projected 2014 shortage? Presumably informing parents is the responsibility of the developers, otherwise they may be guilty of providing misinformation. 

At the heart of the problem appears to be St John's Church of England Primary School, which recently became an academy, placing it outside the influence of KCC. As this story unfolds, one can see exactly why it chose to take that route. St John's has an intake of 30 children, with 11 out of the 16 governors being church appointees (including just 2 parents who are in touch with local concerns- normal schools are likely to have around six or more parent governors). The school is reported to have ample grounds to provide space to cater for additional  children. 

In one sense, the fact that St John's is a Church of England School is an irrelevance, as it is the only school that serves its local community of Grove Green. In another it is central to the issue, for although the school website makes no reference to any responsibility within the local community it was built to serve, it surely has a Christian responsibility for these local families without a local school, especially as it has the capacity to expand, either temporarily or permanently. However, the headteacher, in a letter to parents, confirms the Governors' position that the school is unwilling (not unable!) to serve this local community by admitting another class, but is willing to take in just three additional children as a gesture (although how that fits with Infant Class Legislation is a mystery). 

Whilst this is a problem created by the academy principle of removing local accountability, is it perhaps one that can be resolved by the Diocese of Canterbury, which clearly has oversight of the school through its majority on the Governing Body? Here is an opportunity for it to demonstrate pastoral responsibility to ensure  that a community school serves its local community, rather than settle, as it appears to be doing, for a comfortable life.  

Last modified on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 19:11

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.